|
Post by evileeyore on Oct 20, 2019 12:23:24 GMT
But, she's not resonating with anyone outside of Reason magazine readers so I wonder why the MSM and Clinton are using already spent ammo on her. My guess? Tulsi is Clinton's opposite in almost all the ways that matter and Clinton fundamentally can't understand how that could be unless said person was employed by her literal enemies. That or Hilary is off her rocker. As for Tulsi, like Lang, I agree with some of her policies, but not all of them. But that's just how it goes with most politicians, I've never run into one that matches up with all my politics right down the line.
|
|
|
Post by kirinke on Oct 20, 2019 14:00:25 GMT
I think Clinton jumped the shark. She's accusing somebody of being a Russian asset with no proof. I mean, at least with Trump, there's plenty of smoke. There isn't even a whiff of smoke with this girl.
And you know it's sad when I agree or don't disagree with Nail Bunny.
|
|
|
Post by mustrumridcully on Oct 20, 2019 19:49:55 GMT
Nobody is in control. That's why we are in this situation. Everyone is in it for themselves and are willing to sacrifice society for fortune and fame. I think that a large part of the psychological appeal of conspiracy theories is that it feels far better to believe that Evil is in charge, than to believe that nobody is in charge. If Evil is in charge, then at least you have a clear target, which in turn gives you hope for eventual victory.
But if bad things happen randomly, or as aggregates of the selfishness of billions, then there's no hope. I think lots of people just can't handle that.
I get why conspiracy theories are attractive to many, but I would say it's dangerous to say the "opposite" is true and its all unknowable random chaos. It's not. But instead of thinking in sweeping conspiracy theores, its best to look at the various actors and understand their motives for their behaviour. There usually is some, and its usually not a grand conspiracy, but often far more short-sighted things. There is a logic to the "madness".
A big part in creating reasonably effective and "good" rules for a social system is to predict some of these reasonings and logic behind them, and ensure you create incentives for desired behavior (e.g. actions in the interest of the common good) and disincentives for undesired behavior (e.g. actions that are selfish and harm the common good). Of course, that is easier said than done, and we regularly see how things backfire. The Discworld example is "We have too many rats in the city? Let's put up a reward for every rat tail delivered to the bureau of health!" "What, we now have even more rats in the city? Tax the rat farms!"
|
|
|
Post by evileeyore on Oct 23, 2019 22:06:16 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kirinke on Oct 24, 2019 0:39:28 GMT
Nail bunny, you really need to stay away from the right wing blog sites. They're rotting your brain. Although as satire, it's pretty funny.
Sadly..... Trump said this for real:
COLORADO ― Either President Trump failed remedial geography, or we’ve reached a full-on “Emperor’s New Clothes” scenario.
This, after Trump received a standing ovation in Pittsburgh on Wednesday after boasting about a nonexistent border wall he’s building ― in Colorado.
“We’re building a wall in Colorado ― we’re building a beautiful wall,” Trump told the cheering crowd at a shale energy conference. “A big one that really works, that you can’t get over, you can’t get under.”
If Trump is building a wall on Colorado’s southern border with New Mexico, that’s news to the governors of both states, who were unaware of any such structure.
“Well this is awkward ... Colorado doesn’t border Mexico,” tweeted that state’s governor, Democrat Jared Polis, soon after Trump’s claim. “Good thing Colorado now offers free full day kindergarten so our kids can learn basic geography.”
New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham’s press secretary Nora Sackett was less amused.
“Wouldn’t surprise me if he really did forget about a state that he lost by such a significant margin, especially when that seems to be the only thing of importance to him and given that he can expect more of the same in 2020,” Sackett told HuffPost in an email. “No one wants his wall, whether it’s on the Mexican border, the Colorado border, or the Canadian border.”
In a follow-up statement, a different member of Lujan Grisham’s press office emphasized: “Yes, we are a state.”
Sackett added that, in policy, the Trump administration really does seem to have turned a blind eye to New Mexicans devastated by the opioid crisis and others whose livelihoods depend on border trade.
So, will Trump admit he flunked this particular geography lesson?
If his history with maps ― and the eagerness with which he alters them ― is any indication, probably not. To that end, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) has provided a preview of what we should expect from the Oval Office in the near future.
|
|
|
Post by evileeyore on Oct 24, 2019 1:08:08 GMT
Sadly..... Trump said this for real: You continue hang on Trump's every word and you claim my brain is rotting for posting comedy? Pure loon.
|
|
|
Post by Ovinomancer on Oct 24, 2019 3:19:50 GMT
Huh, when did Colorado become one of the 57 states?
|
|
|
Post by evileeyore on Oct 24, 2019 3:28:05 GMT
“We’re building a wall in Colorado ― we’re building a beautiful wall,” Trump told the cheering crowd at a shale energy conference. “A big one that really works, that you can’t get over, you can’t get under.”
If Trump is building a wall on Colorado’s southern border with New Mexico, that’s news to the governors of both states, who were unaware of any such structure.
“Well this is awkward ... Colorado doesn’t border Mexico,” tweeted that state’s governor, Democrat Jared Polis, soon after Trump’s claim. “Good thing Colorado now offers free full day kindergarten so our kids can learn basic geography.” Trump has outsmarteded everyone, proving his brain is really very big, just like everyone tells him, and is very satisfying to his wife.
|
|
|
Post by kirinke on Oct 24, 2019 11:45:20 GMT
When the satire is real.... You just gotta shake your head.
|
|
|
Post by Kzach on Oct 24, 2019 12:54:47 GMT
Poe's law.
|
|
|
Post by evileeyore on Oct 28, 2019 3:50:44 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kirinke on Nov 3, 2019 20:27:23 GMT
People have been saying that for years.
She's still free.
So that should tell you something.
|
|
|
Post by evileeyore on Nov 4, 2019 0:08:32 GMT
So that should tell you something. Beyond the fact that the rich and powerful quite often get away with literal murder... it tells me you don't understand comedy.
|
|
|
Post by kirinke on Nov 4, 2019 0:39:40 GMT
So that should tell you something. Beyond the fact that the rich and powerful quite often get away with literal murder... it tells me you don't understand comedy. Oh, I understand comedy just fine. I just don't find you very funny.
|
|
|
Post by evileeyore on Nov 4, 2019 2:41:37 GMT
Oh, I understand comedy just fine. If you understood it was a joke, then why did you feel the need to refute what was obviously not true? Do you work for Snopes? It would explain an awful lot about their downslide of late...
|
|