|
Post by evileeyore on Jan 10, 2020 14:20:11 GMT
Lol. At least I see his actions for what they are. A ponzi scheme. You don't actually know what a ponzi scheme is, so... yeah. We don't know what you think you're seeing, but it ain't a ponzi scheme.
|
|
|
Post by Scarbonac on Jan 10, 2020 15:23:13 GMT
The demonstration ( in Iraq) was in response to U.S. airstrikes ( in Iraq). Wait! You're really claiming that if I run into your house and shoot you, it's a "demonstration"? ROFL No. They attacked our embassy. It wasn't a demonstration. It was an attack. They who?
|
|
|
Post by kirinke on Jan 11, 2020 0:17:19 GMT
Iraqi people torched and invaded the place. Trump's response? Kill an Iranian general. Without any proof whatsoever that the guy had anything to do with it. The very fact that they won't release the intel to congress is pretty conclusive they don't have proof.
|
|
|
Post by Scarbonac on Jan 11, 2020 1:13:35 GMT
Iraqi people torched and invaded the place. Trump's response? Kill an Iranian general. Without any proof whatsoever that the guy had anything to do with it. The very fact that they won't release the intel to congress is pretty conclusive they don't have proof.
Eee-yup.
|
|
|
Post by kirinke on Jan 11, 2020 1:34:27 GMT
And then they have the laughable temerity to say that they won't give the info to congress because Congress (Democrats) leaks all over the place. After Trump told his buddies at Mar-A-Lago about the strike and after he's given classified info to the Russians. Ummmm. Right.
Remember kids, even presidents can be charged with war crimes.
|
|
|
Post by Maxperson on Jan 11, 2020 1:58:16 GMT
Iraqi people torched and invaded the place. Trump's response? Kill an Iranian general. Without any proof whatsoever that the guy had anything to do with it. The very fact that they won't release the intel to congress is pretty conclusive they don't have proof.
You really need to stop talking out of your ass. Unless you are in Trumps inner circle and have seen what he has or doesn't have, you don't know anything about proof whatsoever. You're listening to the Democrats who would lie to their mother in order to make Trump look bad.
|
|
|
Post by Maxperson on Jan 11, 2020 1:59:51 GMT
And then they have the laughable temerity to say that they won't give the info to congress because Congress (Democrats) leaks all over the place. After Trump told his buddies at Mar-A-Lago about the strike and after he's given classified info to the Russians. Ummmm. Right.
Remember kids, even presidents can be charged with war crimes.
ROFL It's well known to both Republicans and Democrats that this guy is responsible for hundreds of American deaths in multiple other attacks. Even had this attack he orchestrated against our embassy never happened, he's done enough that it wouldn't even remotely come close to a war crime to kill him.
|
|
|
Post by Kzach on Jan 11, 2020 2:37:53 GMT
And then they have the laughable temerity to say that they won't give the info to congress because Congress (Democrats) leaks all over the place. After Trump told his buddies at Mar-A-Lago about the strike and after he's given classified info to the Russians. Ummmm. Right.
Remember kids, even presidents can be charged with war crimes.
ROFL It's well known to both Republicans and Democrats that this guy is responsible for hundreds of American deaths in multiple other attacks. Even had this attack he orchestrated against our embassy never happened, he's done enough that it wouldn't even remotely come closeg to a war crime to kill him. Idiot. People who commit war crimes are those on the weaker side. The stronger side never commits any. E.g. Bush jr.
|
|
|
Post by Maxperson on Jan 11, 2020 3:31:28 GMT
ROFL It's well known to both Republicans and Democrats that this guy is responsible for hundreds of American deaths in multiple other attacks. Even had this attack he orchestrated against our embassy never happened, he's done enough that it wouldn't even remotely come closeg to a war crime to kill him. Idiot. People who commit war crimes are those on the weaker side. The stronger side never commits any. E.g. Bush jr. WTF are you talking about? You've gone off the deep end again.
|
|
|
Post by kirinke on Jan 11, 2020 4:45:23 GMT
Targeted killings are quite different and yes, it does matter in the court of law both here and internationally.
So yeah. Depending on who you ask, it could be a war crime.
Also considering that the WH won't release the intel backing the strike, I would weigh in on the side of no it wasn't legal.
If it was legal, Trump would be waving the papers around doing a happy dance.
Nobody is saying the dude wasn't a bad guy. He was. Problem is, is his death worth the shit storm it kicks up? Not only that, you do realize that since we target their guys, they will target our guys in the same manner.
You lot are so quick to jump on the YAY Trump wagon, but you don't stop to think about his actions and the consequences stemming from them.
|
|
|
Post by Maxperson on Jan 11, 2020 14:20:46 GMT
Targeted killings are quite different and yes, it does matter in the court of law both here and internationally.
So yeah. Depending on who you ask, it could be a war crime.
Also considering that the WH won't release the intel backing the strike, I would weigh in on the side of no it wasn't legal.
If it was legal, Trump would be waving the papers around doing a happy dance.
Nobody is saying the dude wasn't a bad guy. He was. Problem is, is his death worth the shit storm it kicks up? Not only that, you do realize that since we target their guys, they will target our guys in the same manner.
You lot are so quick to jump on the YAY Trump wagon, but you don't stop to think about his actions and the consequences stemming from them.
Obama engaged in hundreds of targeted killings, including dozens of innocents murdered. Where were you then? I don't remember you screaming war crimes about it. The man was a terrorist. He attacked and murdered hundreds of Americans. Those attacks were all acts of war, as well as terrorism. It's not a war crime to kill a terrorist or a man committing acts of war against our country. And what about the consequences of committing acts of war and terrorism against the U.S.? Why aren't you talking about those? It's because you are so rabidly anti-Trump that you can't see that there could possibly be blame against anyone else. Your hate blinds you.
|
|
|
Post by evileeyore on Jan 11, 2020 17:02:52 GMT
I don't remember you screaming war crimes about it. The man was a terrorist. In the future when switching subjects I recommend a paragraph break. I literally thought you were hyperbolically calling Obama a terrorist fro a few sentences. I mean, I didn't like him either, but that would be a few steps to far... Yes... feed that hate. Grasp it. Stoke it. It's a very large hate, just yuge...
|
|
|
Post by Maxperson on Jan 11, 2020 17:45:20 GMT
I don't remember you screaming war crimes about it. The man was a terrorist. In the future when switching subjects I recommend a paragraph break. I literally thought you were hyperbolically calling Obama a terrorist fro a few sentences. I mean, I didn't like him either, but that would be a few steps to far... Yes... feed that hate. Grasp it. Stoke it. It's a very large hate, just yuge... lol Yes, you're right. I was not calling Obama a terrorist.
|
|
|
Post by kirinke on Jan 12, 2020 0:54:45 GMT
Truth be known, some right wingers actually do consider the left to be terrorists and traitors and some on the left consider those on the right to be the same. Dear leader leads the charge for the right. Le sigh.
I want to bang my head against the wall when I see that.
Neither side has a clue on what a traitor actually is.
|
|
|
Post by kirinke on Jan 12, 2020 13:29:23 GMT
You know it's bad when even the Republicans are starting to get pissed off at Trump.
|
|