|
Post by Libtard on Dec 7, 2021 9:30:34 GMT
|
|
|
Post by evileeyore on Jan 8, 2022 8:14:04 GMT
|
|
|
Post by evileeyore on Jan 9, 2022 18:50:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kirinke on Jan 10, 2022 1:17:53 GMT
At a guess, they'll reverse it soon enough. Now, if only we can get the fucking anti-vaxxers to get the jab, we won't have this problem in the first place. Or at least not as much of a problem.
I hate anti-vaxxers....
|
|
|
Post by evileeyore on Jan 10, 2022 4:48:28 GMT
At a guess, they'll reverse it soon enough. They won't, because it's not good for the economy to treat the replaceable cogs like humans. They won't, get over it. Biden Admin needs to stop fucking around with the "science" and they need to remove Faucci and bring in someone who isn't a known liar to lead the mission. Fuacci destroyed any trust the Gov could have built up and the CDC has just lost credibility with it's latest declaration. We need to test the tetanus shot for efficacy versus COVID, the handful of papers on that look good and that would get the anti-vaxxers on board for getting a tetanus shot as that has a proven safety record and isn't just lining the pockets of Big Pharma. And if Biden's Admin has any sense it will flat out say "No" in no uncertain terms to the "COVID Passport Chip". But as that would mean less money for Biden's donors... well... I expect them to test the waters for it at some point.
|
|
|
Post by Libtard on Jan 10, 2022 8:28:50 GMT
John Campbell floats the idea from some of his watchers that Omicron is a lab-engineered reduction-of-function virus designed to outcompete other strains with more serious symptoms and act as an innoculant. He points out that if the original was a laboratory-made "experiment" it would make sense to have a way of mitigating it with a highly transmissible, non-deadly strain if things got out of hand. He doesn't endorse this theory, and it seems far-fetched, but one of the reasons I like him is that he's willing to talk about it. www.youtube.com/watch?v=fA-fvyGw-cc
|
|
|
Post by kirinke on Jan 10, 2022 12:39:49 GMT
Tha fuck are you drinking? Tetanus is a completely different disease than covid-19. there is no way it would be effective against it. As far as anti-vaxxers go, it doesn't matter what shot you tell them it is, they won't take it voluntarily because they're convinced it's poison.
|
|
|
Post by Libtard on Jan 10, 2022 15:45:12 GMT
Tha fuck are you drinking? Tetanus is a completely different disease than covid-19. there is no way it would be effective against it. As far as anti-vaxxers go, it doesn't matter what shot you tell them it is, they won't take it voluntarily because they're convinced it's poison. Mostly this study: www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.749264/fullStimulating the general immune system into a more robust response to Covid via use of other vaccines. I'm not sure whether there would be a significant number of people who'd take it up, but "all antivaxers" =/= "all covid vaccine rejectors." If you want to save the lives of some stupid people who don't want to be vaccinated against Covid-19, but will take a tetanus or diptheria jab, this might actually have some merit.
|
|
|
Post by evileeyore on Jan 10, 2022 17:14:02 GMT
Tha fuck are you drinking? Definitely not anti-freeze. You should try to slow down on your consumption, it's made you retarded. And with yet two more bold statements full of nonsense you prove to be both uneducated and unwilling to check things for yourself. You are wrong. No you fucking retard, they aren't convinced 'it's poison'. They think a small handful of different things, some are so frothing at the mouth they think that it reduces your immune response, but most, especially the more intelligent anti-COVID 'anti-vaxxers' are simply against it because the various flavors of COVID vaccine have all proven to have serious side-effects in very small percentages of the population, it appears to be a conspiracy to fill Big Pharma's pockets at the expense of their freedoms, and "half" of what they been told about COVID by the government has been "lies". And mostly because COVID is only a serious risk to those with comorbidities (since you know that's what the CDC has said from the beginning and hasn't wavered on) and they mistakenly think that comorbidity means "going to die any minute from something else anyway". If you'd listen to your opponents arguments and complaints you could effectively argue against them instead of sounding like a lunatic all the time. Actually no, it was a couple of other studies that were cut short. One was being used to pitch a new study to be funded by Canada, as hopefully Canada not being in Pig Pharma's pockets they might actually follow through with a large enough study to find conclusive results, and and I hoping the Canadians fund it because they haven't been as fucking stupid and backwards through all this as our government has. John Campbell floats the idea from some of his watchers that Omicron is a lab-engineered reduction-of-function virus designed to outcompete other strains with more serious symptoms and act as an innoculant. He points out that if the original was a laboratory-made "experiment" it would make sense to have a way of mitigating it with a highly transmissible, non-deadly strain if things got out of hand. Interesting idea. I doubt it more than I doubt the Wuhan Accident Theory, but only because I'm too cynical to believe that Big Pharma would allow anything to impede their ability to charge money for vaccines and boosters and anything that increases the likelihood of wiping out COVID-19 "without their vaccines" would impede that. /laughsinFloridaisdoingbetterthanNewYorkandNewJersyetwobluebastions Florida Man strikes again!
|
|
|
Post by kirinke on Jan 10, 2022 23:31:29 GMT
I did read a little of it, none of the studies have been peer reviewed as far as I saw. So it's just speculation at this point.
|
|
|
Post by 3catcircus on Feb 5, 2022 14:54:45 GMT
At a guess, they'll reverse it soon enough. Now, if only we can get the fucking anti-vaxxers to get the jab, we won't have this problem in the first place. Or at least not as much of a problem.
I hate anti-vaxxers....
kirinke: "I'm vaccinated. If you get vaccinated, my vaccination will work more gooder..."
|
|
|
Post by kirinke on Feb 5, 2022 17:48:55 GMT
At least I don't take wormwood for it.
|
|
|
Post by cyphersmith on Feb 6, 2022 0:54:45 GMT
At a guess, they'll reverse it soon enough. Now, if only we can get the fucking anti-vaxxers to get the jab, we won't have this problem in the first place. Or at least not as much of a problem.
I hate anti-vaxxers....
kirinke: "I'm vaccinated. If you get vaccinated, my vaccination will work more gooder..." No. While so many people are not vaccinated, COVID will continue to cause serious problems. Though it's never going away, since it effects MANY different animals. Beyond that, the more who are unvaccinated, the better COVID moves through the population making it more likely that people who are not able to be vaccinated, or for whom the vaccine doesn't work well, will get COVID and die or suffer severe damage. Also, the vaccine, even when it doesn't prevent infection (which it is actually pretty good at, much better than the flu vaccine) almost always prevents serious disease. And COVID does damage to ALL parts of your body. Whether or not you notice it. Meaning that a later illness might kill you, or cause serious damage, when normally it wouldn't have. It can cause clotting, which can cause a heart attack or stroke. It's another mechanism that can damage just about any part of your body.
|
|
|
Post by evileeyore on Feb 6, 2022 20:16:25 GMT
No. While so many people are not vaccinated, COVID will continue to cause serious problems. False. Catching COVID and getting over it is far better (immunologically speaking) than getting the therapeutic and an endless, I mean truly never-ending, series of boosters. Oh my, a true statement from a COVID-Truther. Yes, this is fact, there is no herd immunity, thanks for lying for a year about it Fuaci, how much did Pfizzer pay you again? This statement has a complex relationship with the truth. Those who have recovered from COVID have a stronger "immunity" (no one will ever be immune) to COVID than those who are only "vaccinated", and having both gotten over COVID and later getting the vaccine increases your resistance to reinfection (or infection from other strains) by only like 3%. So, those who have caught COVID have (statistically) no reason to get the therapeutic. Though as someone who caved to familial pressures, I understand those who will take that risk anyway. Which is why people should stop referring to it as a vaccine... This is actually mostly true. "Almost always" is doing a lot of work here though, but I'm too lazy-arsed to go double check the hard figures, so I'll let this one slide, I mean it's pretty accurate even though. The tests are still out on this, but yes, it's looking very 'good' for COVID fucking up pretty much everything in people who are severely effected. Those who fight it off easily/successfully are looking "less to not affected". So can the jab, even in young healthy people. Right now there are studies seriously suggesting that we need to have "COVID" parties for our 'younger, super healthy adults', like the chicken-pox parties of old, so those who can best resist it get over it, and are then "more immunized" against it. COVID will probably be with us forever now, so we need to decide as a populace how to deal with it, by getting most people naturally immunized, or forever paying Big Pharma to "immunize" us? I know which lane line's Biden's pockets more...
|
|
|
Post by cyphersmith on Feb 6, 2022 20:36:24 GMT
No. While so many people are not vaccinated, COVID will continue to cause serious problems. False. Catching COVID and getting over it is far better (immunologically speaking) than getting the therapeutic and an endless, I mean truly never-ending, series of boosters. Nah, the damage it will do to you is much more potentially serious than using the vaccine. Once we started seeing many different animals getting COVID, the idea that it will ever go away was over. You're wrong about the stronger immunity. More people have gotten second infections than have had breakthrough infections. There is NO vaccine that has ever been 100% effective at preventing disease. There were breakthrough infections involved with all of them. Get over the idea that a vaccine prevents infection 100%. It doesn't. No vaccine ever has. We got rid of smallpox because of herd immunity, not because the vaccine was 100% effective. It wasn't. The last person to die from it had been vaccinated. Wah, I put in something you agree is correct and you have to put in some amount of a quibble. Less effected, not unaffected. UNLIKE when you don't get it when you're vaccinated. Only the versions (such as the Johnson and Johnson vaccine) NOT made from mRNA cause clotting. Yeah, COVID parties is a really bad idea. Even for young people, it's much more deadly than chickenpox, or even measles. Were bad deals made for the vaccine manufacturers? YES, absolutely. Legislation preventing the companies from being sued was a bad idea. But like any disease we have a vaccine for, getting the vaccine is better than not getting it.
|
|